The Clinical Study on the Effects of Sedation，Analgesia and Slow Induction of Endotracheal Intubation on Hemodynamics，Reduction of Postoperative Adverse Memory and Psycho-psychological Effects in Patients with General Anesthesia
-
摘要:
目的 探讨镇静镇痛慢诱导气管插管技术对减轻血流动力学波动，减少清醒气管插管对手术患者产生术后不良记忆、负面情绪、心理或精神影响。 方法 选取昆明市第二人民医院2017年6月至2020年10月所收治的全身麻醉气管插管下非仰卧位手术患者116例，采用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组，每组各58例，对照组患者给予常规快速诱导全麻气管插管，由医护人员完成体位摆放；研究组患者给予充分镇静、镇痛、气管表面麻醉慢诱导并保留自主呼吸行气管插管，医护人员在患者自主配合下完成体位摆放后进行全身麻醉。对比2组患者血流动力学指标、术后记忆情况及心理状态评估。 结果 2组T1时间点组间收缩压（SBP）、舒张压（DBP）、心率（HR）血流动力学稳定未见统计学差异（P > 0.05）；T 2时间点组间收缩压（SBP）、舒张压（DBP）、心率（HR）血流动力学稳定研究组优于对照组（P < 0.05）。2组T 3时间点收缩压（SBP）、舒张压（DBP）、心率（HR）组间比较血流动力学稳定对照组优于研究组（P < 0.05），2组T 4时间点收缩压（SBP）、舒张压（DBP）、心率（HR）组间比较血流动力学稳定研究组优于对照组（P < 0.05）。研究组给药开始至完成气管插管时间长于对照组（ P < 0.05），2组手术结束至清醒拔除气管导管时间无明显统计学差异（ P > 0.05）。2组患者术后1 d对进入手术室后记忆、心理状态测评组间及组内比较均未见明显统计学差异（ P > 0.05）。 结论 全麻手术患者采用镇静、镇痛慢诱导气管插管技术不会增加患者产生术后不良记忆、负面情绪、心理或精神影响的概率。慢诱导临床操作时间稍长于快诱导，但不会引起苏醒延迟及拔管延迟，虽然插管时造成一定程度的血流动力学变化，但影响轻微，拔管时可减少拔管刺激引起的不良反应，对血流动力学影响优于快诱导气管插管。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of sedation and analgesia induced tracheal intubation on reducing hemodynamic fluctuation and conscious tracheal intubation on postoperative adverse memory, negative emotion, psychological or mental effects. Methods 116 patients who were treated in our hospital from June 2017 to October 2020 were divided into the study group and the control group, with 58 cases in each group. The control group was given routine rapid induction of general anesthesia rapid induction of general anesthesia tracheal intubation, the medical staff completed posture placement, the study group was given sedation, analgesia, tracheal surface anesthesia slowly induced to lethargy and retained spontaneous breathing tracheal intubation. The hemodynamic indexes, postoperative memory and psychological status of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic stability between the two groups T1 time points （P > 0.05）; the systolic blood pressure （SBP）, diastolic blood pressure （DBP）, heart rate （HR） hemodynamic stability of the study group was better than those of the control group （ P < 0.05）. Of the two groups, the T3 time point systolic blood pressure （SBP）, diastolic blood pressure （DBP）, heart rate （HR） of the study group were better than those of the control group （0.05）, the systolic blood pressure （SBP）, diastolic blood pressure （DBP）, and heart rate （HR） of the study group were better than those of the control group （ P < 0.05）. From the beginning of administration to the completion of tracheal intubation in the study group （ P < 0.05）, At the end of operation, there was no significant difference between the two groups （ P > 0.05）. There was no significant difference in memory and mental state between the two groups 1 d after operation （ P > 0.05）. Conclusion Sedation, analgesia and slow induction of tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia will not increase the probability of postoperative adverse memory, negative emotional, psychological or mental effects. The clinical operation time of slow induction is slightly longer than that of fast induction, but it will not cause the delay of awakening and extubation. Although the hemodynamic changes are caused by intubation, the effect is slight. Extubation can reduce the adverse reactions caused by extubation stimulation, and the hemodynamic effect is better than that of fast induced tracheal intubation. -
Key words:
- Sedation /
- Analgesia /
- Slow induction /
- Tracheal intubation /
- General anesthesia /
- Hemodynamics /
- Mental state /
- Bad memory
-
图 1 2组临床用时指标对比（n = 58）
Figure 1. Comparison of clinical time record indexes between two groups（n = 58）
表 1 2组血流动力学指标对比（ $\bar x \pm s$）
Table 1. Comparison of hemodynamic indexes between the two groups （ $\bar x \pm s$）
指标 组别 时间点 F，P T1 T2 T3 T4 SBP
（mmHg）对照组 138.19 ± 7.32 101.72 ± 6.51 103.38 ± 7.84 139.21 ± 5.75 531.30， < 0.001 研究组 138.64 ± 7.81 127.41 ± 6.33 137.73 ± 8.62 126.51 ± 6.17 45.950， < 0.001 t/P 0.320/0.749 21.547/ < 0.001 22.451/ < 0.001 11.468/ < 0.001 DBP
（mmHg）对照组 60.19 ± 6.36 49.43 ± 5.82 50.25 ± 7.13 67.57 ± 6.48 103.955， < 0.001 研究组 60.43 ± 6.10 55.13 ± 5.65 62.31 ± 7.53 60.33 ± 5.14 14.495， < 0.001 t/P 0.207/0.836 5.352/ < 0.001 8.857/ < 0.001 6.666/ < 0.001 HR
（次/min）对照组 81.35 ± 6.73 91.54 ± 6.25 95.58 ± 6.33 103.29 ± 7.46 107.525， < 0.001 研究组 80.58 ± 6.17 77.63 ± 6.82 102.18 ± 7.97 90.20 ± 6.75 146.952， < 0.001 t/P 0.642，0.522 11.452， < 0.001 4.939， < 0.001 9.909， < 0.001 注：收缩压（SBP）：F组别 = 15.672，P组别 < 0.001； F时间 = 465.584，P时间 < 0.001； F组别*时间 = 7.256，P组别*时间 < 0.001；舒张压（DBP）： F组别 = 7.956，P组别 = 0.006；F时间 = 84.157，P时间 < 0.001； F组别*时间 = 3.586，P组别*时间 = 0.014；心率（HR）：F组别 = 10.268，P组别 = 0.002；F时间 = 132.594，P时间 < 0.001； F组别*时间 = 9.536，P组别*时间 < 0.001。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2组临床用时指标对比[（ $\bar x \pm s$），min]
Table 2. Comparison of clinical time record indexes between two groups [（ $\bar x \pm s$），min]
组别 插管时间 拔管时间 对照组（n = 58） 9.75 ± 2.14 11.58 ± 2.52 研究组（n = 58） 14.32 ± 3.63 11.08 ± 2.14 t 8.259 1.152 P < 0.001 * 0.252 *P < 0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 2组麻醉过程中记忆得分对比[（ $\bar x \pm s$），分]
Table 3. Memory of anaesthesia treatment score between the two groups [（ $\bar x \pm s$），scores]
组别 插管中记忆评分 操作时间位点评分 韦氏量表评分 总分 对照组（n = 58） 0.00 1.94 ± 0.02 2.13 ± 0.07 4.08 ± 0.15 研究组（n = 58） 0.00 1.95 ± 0.05 2.15 ± 0.08 4.11 ± 0.18 t - 1.414 1.433 0.975 P - 0.160 0.155 0.332
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 2组焦虑评分对比[（ $\bar x \pm s$），分]
Table 4. Comparison of anxiety between the two groups [（ $\bar x \pm s$），scores]
组别 手术前HAMA评分 手术后1 d HAMA评分 t P 对照组（n = 58） 15.21 ± 2.14 9.63 ± 2.12 14.107 < 0.001 * 研究组（n = 58） 15.35 ± 3.63 9.58 ± 2.66 9.765 < 0.001 * t 0.253 0.112 P 0.801 0.911 *P < 0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 2组焦虑评分对比[（ $\bar x \pm s$），分]
Table 5. Comparison of depression between the two groups [（ $\bar x \pm s$），scores]
组别 手术前HAMD评分 手术后1 d HAMD评分 t P 对照组（n = 58） 5.41 ± 3.37 5.32 ± 2.74 0.158 0.875 研究组（n = 58） 5.87 ± 3.49 5.57 ± 2.29 0.547 0.585 t 0.722 0.533 P 0.472 0.595
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Jaime Hyman,David Apatov,Daniel Katz,et al. A prospective observational study of video laryngoscopy use in difficult airway management[J]. The Laryngoscope,2021,131(1):82-86. doi: 10.1002/lary.28637 [2] 王燕. 经纤支镜行表面麻醉在困难气道中的应用[J]. 继续医学教育,2020,34(11):149-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.11.082 [3] Olesya Kalmatskaya,Vladimir Karavaev,Alexander Tikhonov. Slow induction of chlorophyll a fluorescence excited by blue and red light in Tradescantia leaves acclimated to high and low light[J]. Photosynthesis Research,2019,142(3):12-25. [4] 邵宏斌,李家祥,史成富. 健忘镇痛慢诱导气管插管在基层医院的应用[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(1):9,13. [5] 杨玉珍,万林. 纤支镜在疑似困难气道插管中的临床应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2020,12(30):122-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.30.036 [6] Olesya Kalmatskaya,Vladimir Karavaev,Alexander Tikhonov. Slow induction of chlorophyll a fluorescence excited by blue and red light in Tradescantia leaves acclimated to high and low light[J]. Photosynthesis Research,2019,142(3):857-862. [7] Kumar Abhishek,Gupta Nishkarsh. Total control introducer-aided nasotracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope in an anticipated difficult airway:A novel technique[J]. BMJ Case Reports,2020,13(12):18-23. [8] Yang Jing,Wu Youping,Xu Yan,et al. Dexmedetomidine resists intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury by Inhibiting TLR4/MyD88/NF-κBSignaling[J]. Journal of Surgical Research,2021,260(1):312-328. [9] Han Chunji,Li Peng,Guo Zhenggang,et al. Improving mucosal anesthesia for awake endotracheal intubation with a novel method:A prospective,assessor-blinded,randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiology,2020,20(1):57-66. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00959-2 [10] Wetsch Wolfgang,Schroeder Daniel. Unilateral blindness following superior laryngeal nerve block for awake tracheal intubation in a case of posterior cervical spine surgery.[J]. Surgical Neurology International,2020,11(8):121-133. [11] Luca Cabrini,Martina Baiardo Redaelli,Alberto Zangrillo. Neuromonitoring as an alternative to awake intubation in uncooperative patients at risk for cervical spine injury[J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2020,64(6):625-633. [12] Ravish Kapoor,Angela Truong,Dam Thuy Truong. Neuromonitoring as an alternative to awake intubation in uncooperative patients at risk for cervical spine injury[J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2020,64(6):145-150. [13] Olesya Kalmatskaya,Vladimir Karavaev,Alexander Tikhonov. Slow induction of chlorophyll a fluorescence excited by blue and red light in Tradescantia leaves acclimated to high and low light[J]. Photosynthesis Research,2019,142(3):387-392. [14] Zhou Zhiqiang,Zhao Xu,Zhang Chuanhan,et al. Preoperativefour dimensional computed tomography imaging and simulation of a fibreoptic route for awake intubation in a patient with an epiglottic mass[J]. British Journal of Anaesthesia,2020,125(3):104-111. [15] Cheng Tong,Wang Likuan,Wu HaiYin,et al. Shikani optical stylet for awake nasal intubation in patients undergoing head and neck surgery[J]. The Laryngoscope,2020,43(2):366-378. [16] Wang Xiaoliang,Ya JieXu,Hong GuangBao. Comparison of two kinds of airway surface anesthesia by fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake trachea intubation[J]. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care,2020,30(6):8-19. [17] Khan Hiba,Khoriati Achraf,Lazic Stefan,et al. The effect of time to surgery in neck of femur fracture patients with ASA Grade of 3 and above[J]. Hip International:The Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy,2020,12(10):458-462. [18] Blacher Mariana,Zimerman And,Engster Pedro,et al. Revisiting heart failure assessment based on objective measures in NYHA functional classes I and Ⅱ[J]. Heart(British Cardiac Society),2020,26(8):107-115. [19] 何媛媛,梅玫,王林刚,等. 右美托咪定对老年高血压全麻患者血流动力学和认知功能及外周血淋巴细胞信号通路蛋白表达水平的影响[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2020,28(10):978-981. [20] 高仲淳,邹波,蓝恭赛,等. 20~59岁成年人体质指数随年龄变化轨迹与高血压发病的关系研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(8):954-958. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.140 [21] 彭沛华,陈燕,曾毅. 右美托咪定和咪达唑仑用于清醒插管患者镇静的效果比较[J]. 实用医学杂志,2011,27(13):2428-2429. [22] 余洪梅. 右美托咪啶用于困难气道清醒慢诱导气管插管的效果分析[J]. 心理月刊,2020,15(5):177. [23] 吴强,林静,刘丽,等. 小剂量右美托咪定复合地佐辛用于困难气道纤支镜清醒插管的临床观察[J]. 岭南急诊医学杂志,2019,24(6):546-548. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-301X.2019.06.011 [24] Zou Yi,Ling Yingzi,Wei Lai,et al. The effect of a small priming dose of sufentanil on sufentanil-induced cough[J]. Journal of Perianesthesianursing Official Journal of The American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses,2020,35(6):447-449. [25] 王健,邹义壮,崔界峰,等. 韦克斯勒记忆量表第四版中文版(成人版)的修订[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(1):53-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.01.010 [26] 汪海松. 异丙酚复合右美托咪定麻醉对术中知晓和术后记忆的影响分析[A]. 国际数字医学会. 2017国际数字医学会数字中医药分会论文集[C]. 国际数字医学会: 湖南中医药大学期刊杂志社, 2017, 1（3）: 65-66. [27] 李杰,汪鼎鼎,李卫星. 纤支镜引导表面麻醉在插管困难的喉癌患者清醒插管中的应用[J]. 复旦学报(医学版),2020,47(3):367-370,391. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2020.03.009 [28] 徐志侠,丁书缘,陈志峰,等. 利多卡因减少口腔颌面术后留置人工气道患者呛咳反射并降低飞沫传播风险的研究[J]. 世界临床药物,2020,41(12):973-977. [29] 张艳华. 认知行为疗法对焦虑抑郁患者HAMA、HAMD评分的影响[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2020,52(8):967-968. [30] 罗天燕,张英. 术前焦虑抑郁对围术期神经认知障碍影响研究进展[J]. 西南医科大学学报,2020,43(3):318-322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2020.03.023 [31] Mark Zimmerman,Justine Thompson,Joseph Diehl,et al. Is the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier interview a valid measure of anxiety in patients with generalized anxiety disorder:A comparison to the Hamilton Anxiety Scale[J]. Psychiatry Research,2020,286(12):1244-1250. [32] Kaisler Maria,Hyde Robert,Sandefur Benjamin,et al. Double-blind,placebo-controlled,proof-of-concept trial of a kappa-selective opioid receptor antagonistaugmentation in treatment-resistant depression[J]. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry:Official Journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists,2020,32(4):521-223. [33] 刘丽丽,杨表,张晗,等. 异丙酚和七氟醚对LC患者术后早期认知功能和记忆的对比评估[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2019,40(1):96-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2019.01.021 [34] 杨潇潇,靳溪源,王清秀,等. 全身麻醉下盲肠切除术后小鼠空间学习记忆能力下降的中枢炎症机制[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版),2020,41(1):41-46. [35] 鲁汉杰,张穗,黄蓉,等. 麻醉后恢复室术后患者应激反应真实体验的质性研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(3):34-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2016.03.009 [36] 李恩泽,李倩琴,王睿苓,等. 围手术期的心理评估与心脏术后脑损害及其他因素的相关性[J]. 分子影像学杂志,2019,42(3):383-387. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2019.03.24 [37] 洪勇,肖振涛,周民伟,等. 不同剂量右美托咪定对意外创伤手术患者应激障碍的影响[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2020,23(6):649-653. [38] Raj Naily,Verthein Uwe,Grundmann Johanna,et al. Internalizing and externalizing subtypes in female patients with co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders[J]. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,2021,121(5):87-89. [39] Cheng Tong,Wang Likuan,Yang Xu Dong. By mass communication specialist 2nd class chelsea kennedy. Comfort medical staff evaluates AMAL for disaster relief[J]. U. S. Department of Defense Information / FIND,2010,54(7):247-250. [40] Eagleman Sarah L,Bruce MacIver. Advances in precision anaesthesia may be found bytesting our resistance to change[J]. British Journal of Anaesthesia,2020,125(3):324-326. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.021 -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 4266
- HTML全文浏览量: 2244
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
