抗核抗体对孕妇梅毒抗体检测干扰
Observation on the Interference of Anti-nuclear Antibody on Detection of Syphilis Antibody in Pregnant Women
-
摘要: 目的 探讨抗核抗体 (ANA) 及9种抗ENA抗体 (Ro-52, SSA, SSB, Jo-1, RNP/Sm, Sm, Scl-70, Sm, Scl-70, PM-Scl, ds DNA) 对孕妇梅毒抗体 (TP-Ab) 检测的干扰及影响.方法 经ELISA方法检测138例抗核抗体阳性孕妇 (实验组1) 、55例抗核抗体阴性孕妇 (实验组2) 和60例非孕妇健康体检者 (健康对照组) 血清TP-Ab抗体, 合计253例, 并分析ANA及其9种抗ENA抗体的TP-Ab检出情况, 运用TPPA法进行确认评价;各组间率的比较采用χ2.结果 实验组1中TP-Ab阳性12例占8.70% (12/138) , 显著高于健康对照组全部阴性 (P<0.05) ;2组间[实验组2中TP-Ab阳性1例占1.82% (1/55) 与健康对照组中TP-Ab全部阴性]差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05) ;抗ENV抗体的TP-Ab阳性仅出现在Ro-52和SSA, 阳性率分别为14.71% (10/68) 和5.40% (2/37) , 2组间差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05) ;253标本TPPA结果均为阴性.结论 ANA可干扰TP-Ab的检测, 造成假阳性结果, 尤其是Ro-52引起的发生率较高.Abstract: Objectives To investigate the effects of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and nine anti-ENA antibodies (Ro-52, SSA, SSB, Jo-1, RNP/Sm, Sm, Scl-70, Sm, Scl-70, PM-Scl, ds DNA) on the detection of syphilis antibody in pregnant women. Methods A total of 253 cases was recruited, with 138 anti-nuclear antibody positive pregnant women (experimental group 1) , 55 anti-nuclear antibody negative pregnant women (experimental group 2) and 60 healthy non-pregnant women (healthy control group) and serum TP-Ab was detected with ELISA as screening method. The positive incidents of TP-Ab of ANA and its nine anti-ENA antibody were confirmed by TPPA method. Chi-square test was used to compared positive rate. Results There were 12 cases of TP-Ab positive in the experimental group 1, accounting for 8.70% (12/138) , which was significantly higher than that in the healthy control group (P<0.05) , while there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between experimental group 2 and control group, with TP-Ab rate of 1.82% (1/55) and zero re.positive antibody TP-Ab of Anti-ENV antibody were only detected in Ro-52 and SSA, which of positive incidence accounted for 14.71% (10/68) and 5.40% (2/37) respectively, there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05) . The results in 253 cases were totally confirmed negative through TPPA method. Conclusions ANA can interfere with the detection of TP-Ab, which caused false positive results, especially the risk of false positivity caused by Ro-52 is higher.
-
Key words:
- Antinuclear antibodies /
- Pregnant women /
- Syphilis antibody
-
[1]苗岩, 欧春怡, 王学斌, 等.先天性梅毒实验室检测方法学评价[J].中华全科医学, 2012, 10 (7) :1137. [2]赵花, 李军民, 张红.TP-ELISA法检测梅毒抗体假阳性结果的影响因素[J].武警医学, 2014, 20 (10) :1003-1007. [3]吕松琴, 赵华, 宝福凯, 等.ECLIA法与ELISA法在梅毒诊断中的临床价值的对比[J].昆明医科大学学报, 2016, 37 (4) :124-127. [4]释艳华, 胡月, 孙润芸.不同梅毒检测方法在孕妇梅毒筛查中的应用[J].中国热带医学, 2014, 14 (10) :1213-1215. [5]李金明.感染性疾病血清学检验中应重视对弱反应性标本的确认[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2006, 29 (7) :577-580. [6]宋焕景, 侯生根, 陈建.梅毒特异性抗体试验生物学假阳性分析[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2013, 34 (14) :1846-1847. [7]丁静, 王泉, 王庆国.RPR、TP-ELISA、TPPA试验在梅毒诊断中的应用评价[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2016, 37 (7) :997-998. [8]李瑛, 李军.TP-ELISA、RPR与TPPA检测诊断梅毒的临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志, 2016, 45 (10) :1398-1399. [9]孙业富.某些自身免疫性抗体对TP-ELISA试验干扰的观察[J].江西医学检验, 2003, 21 (5) :371-372. [10]钟小芬, 毛凌哲.不同梅毒血清学试验联合运用价值分析[J].检验医学, 2016, 31 (3) :217-219. [11]谭旭斌.3TP法与ELISA法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的价值对比研究[J].河北医学, 2016, 22 (2) :345-346. [12]陈存存, 范列英.抗HCV抗体和抗TP抗体筛查试验的假阳性问题及对策研究进展[J].检验医学, 2015, 30 (12) :1167-1174. [13]杨洪鹏, 赵利, 刘琳.老年人群梅毒抗体酶联免疫吸附试验检测假阳性结果原因分析[J].中国基层医药, 2016, 23 (14) :2220-2221. [14]朱建萍.梅毒的三种血清学检验方法的比较[J].医学检验与临床, 2016, 27 (2) :44-45. [15] 胡惠萍, 袁晓华.梅毒ELISA操作的改良与评价[J].现代检验医学杂志, 2013, 28 (2) :131-132.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2635
- HTML全文浏览量: 764
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 0