Effects of Tactile/Motor Stimulation Massage on Feeding Outcomes and Neuromotor Development in Preterm Infants
-
摘要:
目的 观察触觉/运动刺激按摩对早产儿喂养效果、神经及运动发育水平的影响。 方法 选取云南省第三人民医院新生儿科重症监护病房2024年1月至2024年7月住院早产儿136例,利用随机数字表法分为对照组和试验组各68例。对照组接受早产儿常规护理方法,在常规早产儿护理方法的基础上,试验组采用触觉/运动刺激按摩的方法进行干预。比较两组住院早产儿管饲喂养转为经口喂养时间(d)、完全经口喂养率(%)、喂养不耐受发生率(%),体重(g)、身长(cm)、头围(cm),新生儿行为神经测定评分(NBNA),运动发育指数(PDI)。 结果 试验组管饲喂养转为经口喂养时间(12.73±1.86)d明显短于对照组(13.66±1.68)d,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),试验组完全经口喂养率(89.7%)明显大于对照组(70.6%),P < 0.05,试验组喂养不耐受发生率(8.8%)明显小于对照组(16.2%),P < 0.05;试验组体重、身长、头围优于对照组(P < 0.05);试验组新生儿行为神经测定评分(36.16±1.53)分明显高于对照组(35.10±2.66)分(P < 0.05);试验组运动发育指数(76.88±6.12)分明显高于对照组(74.34±5.07)分(P < 0.05)。 结论 触觉/运动刺激按摩可有效改善早产儿喂养情况,促进早产儿的神经及运动发育水平。 Abstract:Objective To observe the effects of tactile/motor stimulation massage on feeding outcomes and neuromotor development levels of preterm infants. Methods A total of 136 preterm hospitalized infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province from January 2024 to July 2024 were enrolled and randomly assigned to a control group and an experimental group, with 68 cases in each group. The control group received the routine care for preterm infants, while the experimental group received tactile/motor stimulation massage as an intervention in addition to the routine care. The time taken from gavage to oral feeding (d), the rate of complete oral feeding (%), the incidence of feeding intolerance (%), the weight(g), the length(cm), the head circumference(cm), neonatal behavioral neurometric score (NBNA) and Psychomotor development index (PDI) were compared between the two groups. Results The time from gavage to oral feeding in the experimental group (12.73±1.86) days was significantly shorter than that in the control group (13.66±1.68) days, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the rate of complete oral feeding in the experimental group (89.7%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (70.6%), P < 0.05, and the incidence of feeding intolerance in the experimental group (8.8%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (16.2%), P < 0.05; The experimental group showed superior results in weight, length, and head circumference compared to the control group (P < 0.05); The neonatal behavioral neurometry score of the experimental group (36.16±1.53) was significantly higher than that of the control group (35.10±2.66) , P < 0.05, and the motor development index in the experimental group (76.88±6.12) was significantly higher than that in the control group (74.34±5.07), P < 0.05. Conclusion Tactile/motor stimulation massage can effectively improve the feeding status and promote the neuromotor development of preterm infants. -
表 1 两组住院早产儿一般资料比较[n(%)/M(P25,P75)]
Table 1. Comparison of general data of two groups of hospitalized preterm infants [n(%)/M(P25,P75)]
项目 试验组(n = 68) 对照组(n = 68) χ2/Z P 性别[n(%)] 0.118 0.732 男 35(51.5) 31(45.6) 女 33(48.5) 37(54.4) 胎龄(周) 32(30,33) 32(29,33) 0.325 0.745 出生体重(g) 2429 (1991.25 ,2480 )2257 (2109 ,2436.5 )1.759 0.079 分娩方式[n(%)] 0.265 0.607 顺产 37(54.4) 28(41.2) 剖宫产 31(45.6) 40(58.8) 5 min Apgar评分(分) 9(8,9) 8(7.25,9) 0.961 0.337 表 2 两组住院早产儿管饲喂养转为经口喂养时间、完全经口喂养率、喂养不耐受发生率比较[($\bar x \pm s $)/n(%)]
Table 2. Comparison of time taken from gavage to oral feeding,rate of complete oral feeding,and incidence of feeding intolerance between the two groups[($ \bar x \pm s $)/n(%)]
组别 管饲喂养转为经口喂养时间(d) 完全经口喂养率 喂养不耐受发生率 试验组(n = 68) 12.73 ± 1.86 61(89.7) 6(8.8) 对照组(n = 68) 13.66 ± 1.68 48(70.6) 11(16.2) t/χ2 −3.057 49.111 76.50 P 0.003* < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 3 两组住院早产儿体重、身长、头围比较($\bar x \pm s $)
Table 3. The weight, length and head circumference of hospitalized preterm infants were compared between the two groups ($\bar x \pm s $)
组别 体重(g) 身长(cm) 头围(cm) 试验组(n=68) 2889.34 ±271.9650.29±1.68 34.32±0.83 对照组(n=68) 2721.13 ±363.2649.59±1.06 33.57±0.99 t 3.057 2.918 4.751 P 0.003* 0.004* <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 4 两组住院早产儿新生儿行为神经测定评分($\bar x \pm s $)
Table 4. Comparison of neonatal behavioral neurometric scores and motor development index between the two groups ($\bar x \pm s $)
组别 总分(分) 行为能力(分) 被动肌张力(分) 主动肌张力(分) 原始反射(分) 一般评估(分) 试验组(n=68) 36.16±1.53 10.97±0.93 7.34±0.74 7.12±0.72 5.36±0.55 5.57±0.55 对照组(n=68) 35.10±2.66 9.99±1.57 6.41±1.14 6.40±0.81 4.78±0.67 5.15±0.79 t 2.844 4.443 5.578 5.461 5.322 3.622 P 0.005* <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 5 运动发育指数比较($\bar x \pm s $)
Table 5. Comparison of motor development index ($\bar x \pm s $)
组别 运动发育指数(分) 试验组(n=68) 76.88±6.12 对照组(n =68) 74.34±5.07 t 2.638 P 0.009* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] 关妙仪,方琼吟,刘嘉怡,等. 早产儿母亲家庭抗逆力现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 全科护理,2024,22(13):2535-2539. [2] Beck S,Wojdyla D,Say L,et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity[J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2010,88(1):31-38. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554 [3] Kanagasabai P S,Mohan D,Lewis L E,et al. Effect of multisensory stimulation on neuromotor development in preterm infants[J]. Indian J Pediatr,2013,80(6):460-464. doi: 10.1007/s12098-012-0945-z [4] 李戈. 口腔功能训练联合腹部按摩在早产儿经口喂养和生长发育的影响[J]. 中国医药指南,2022,20(33):49-52. [5] 孙瑜,刘婉,洪心敏,等. 早产儿出院后母婴皮肤接触对母乳喂养及其神经行为发育的影响[J/OL]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2024,25(7): 1-6. [6] Ullenhag A,Persson K,Nyqvist K H. Motor performance in very preterm infants before and after implementation of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment programme in a neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Acta Paediatr,2009,98(6):947-952. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01258.x [7] Kara Ö K,Şahin S,Kara K,et al. Neuromotor and sensory development in preterm infants: Prospective study[J]. Turk Pediatri Ars,2020,55(1):46-53. [8] Hathaway E E,Luberto C M,Bogenschutz L H,et al. Integrative care therapies and physiological and pain-related outcomes in hospitalized infants[J]. Glob Adv Health Med,2015,4(4):32-37. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.029 [9] 郭长胜. 触觉刺激结合五行音乐对早产仔鼠学习记忆及海马BDNF/TrkB/CREB表达的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江中医药大学,2023. [10] Elmoneim M A,Mohamed H A,Awad A,et al. Effect of tactile/kinesthetic massage therapy on growth and body composition of preterm infants[J]. Eur J Pediatr,2021,180(1):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03738-w [11] 颜惠萍,施燕禧,张美莉,等. 不同口腔干预运动在早产儿经口喂养中的临床研究[J]. 护理实践与研究,2020,17(5):112-115. [12] 冯奇妹. 听触二维感受刺激对早产儿经口喂养效果的影响[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊),2024,31(1):60-62. [13] 余婷,马月兰,沈婷,等. 重力喂养与口腔按摩联合干预对经口喂养早产儿的护理效果[J]. 护理实践与研究,2023,20(15):2319-2323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2023.15.021 [14] 祝晶莹,唐香,李乔英. 鸟巢式护理联合抚触对缓解新生儿神经系统发育迟缓的效果[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊),2023,30(5):63-67. [15] 陈凌云,王彦娟. 早期康复护理对高危新生儿认知和运动功能的影响[J]. 河南医学研究,2022,31(4):744-747. [16] Liu L,Oza S,Hogan D,et al. Global,regional,and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13,with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: An updated systematic analysis[J]. Lancet (London,England),2015,31(1):385-420. [17] Diemert A,Arck P C. Preterm birth: Pathogenesis and clinical consequences revisited[J]. Semin Immunopathol,2020,42(4):375-376. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00809-w [18] 简萍,李妍,马丽丽,等. 早产低出生体重儿781例相关危险因素分析[J]. 中国医刊,2022,57(3):290-293. [19] Vogel J P,Chawanpaiboon S,Moller A B,et al. The global epidemiology of preterm birth[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.,2018,52(10):3-12. [20] Sandoval C C,Castellanos G A,Ospina R A,et al. Motor development in premature infants: Study protocol for an interdisciplinary hospital-home intervention[J]. Pediatr Neonatol,2023,64(5):577-584. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.12.015 [21] Marlow N,Hennessy E M,Bracewell M A. et al. Motor and executive functionat 6 years of age after extremely preterm birth[J]. Pediatrics,2007,120(4):793. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0440 [22] Cleaveland K. Feeding challenges in the late preterm infant[J]. Neonatal Netw,2010,29(1):37-41. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.29.1.37 [23] 司马义,张素丽,玛依拉·买买提,等. 早产发病因素与防治临床研究[J]. 重庆医学,2021,50(S1):145-147. [24] 顾晶菁,张丽珊. 上海市浦东新区 1176 例产妇中医体质分布及与围产期抑郁的相关性分析[J]. 山西医药杂志,2021,50(21):2993-2996. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.21.005 [25] 王卉,王紫阳,廖学林,等. 循经抚触结合常规康复治疗新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病神经行为障碍的效果[J]. 中国当代医药,2022,29(14):100-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2022.14.026 [26] Antoniazzi C T,Metz V G,Roversi K,et al. Tactile stimulation during different developmental periods modifies hippocampal BDNF and GR,affecting memory and behavior in adult rats[J]. Hippocampus,2017,27(2):210-220. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22686 [27] Moyer M L,Luetkemeier M,Boomer L,et al. Effect of physical activity on bone mineralization in premature infants[J]. Journal of Shanghai Medica,1999,127(4):620-625. [28] 唐孟言,刘孝美,杜鹃. 早产儿与足月儿早期神经运动发育的差异性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2022,30(10):1149-1157. doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1477 [29] 李少澍,赖素贤,林秀瑶,等. 推拿方案对早产喂养不耐受患儿生长发育的影响[J]. 中外医学研究,2022,20(30):145-148. [30] Yildizdas H Y,Erdem B,Karahan D Y,et al. Effect of whole body massage on pain scores of neonates during venous puncture and comparison with oral dextrose and Kangaroo care,a randomized controlled evaluator-blind clinical study[J]. J Perinatol,2023,43(5):590-594. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01570-8 [31] Dos Anjos F R,Nakato A M,Hembecker P K,et al. Effects of hydrotherapy and tactile-kinesthetic stimulation on weight gain of preterm infants admitted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J),2022,98(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.011 -