留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

药物成瘾记忆再巩固及干预研究进展

张文,  王华伟,  朱梅

张文, 王华伟, 朱梅. 药物成瘾记忆再巩固及干预研究进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
引用本文: 张文, 王华伟, 朱梅. 药物成瘾记忆再巩固及干预研究进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
Wen ZHANG, Huawei WANG, Mei ZHU. Memory Reconsolidation and Intervention in Drug Addiction[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.
Citation: Wen ZHANG, Huawei WANG, Mei ZHU. Memory Reconsolidation and Intervention in Drug Addiction[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.

药物成瘾记忆再巩固及干预研究进展

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(82460452);上海市神经超声影像诊疗重点实验室基金(NUS2026010)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张文(1984~),云南曲靖人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事超声治疗药物成瘾研究工作

    通讯作者:

    朱梅,E-mail:zhumeiacademic@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R749.6

Memory Reconsolidation and Intervention in Drug Addiction

  • 摘要: 药物成瘾相关线索可通过唤起持久的药物奖赏记忆诱发渴求与复吸,靶向记忆再巩固被认为是削弱此类病理性记忆的重要策略。梳理药物成瘾记忆再巩固的时间边界、脑区网络和分子机制,并比较药理学、提取-消退及神经调控等干预的临床转化证据。现有研究提示,记忆提取后形成的短暂易损状态受预测误差、提取时长、记忆年龄和强度等边界条件制约;杏仁核、海马、前额叶皮层与伏隔核在该时间窗内形成动态网络,NMDAR、mTORC1、BDNF-TrkB、泛素-蛋白酶体系统及单胺递质共同参与记忆去稳定化与再稳定。动物研究证据较充分,而人体研究主要集中于普萘洛尔、氯胺酮和提取-消退程序,小样本、结局异质性及长期随访不足限制了证据确定性。本文进一步提出“边界条件—神经环路—分子可塑性—干预策略—临床结局”的多层级调控框架,以期为成瘾记忆精准干预和临床试验设计提供依据。
  • 图  1  药物记忆再巩固的时间—环路—分子机制整合示意图

    Figure  1.  Integrated schematic of temporal,circuit,and molecular mechanisms underlying drug memory reconsolidation

    图  2  传统消退与MRUP的时间流程及关键边界条件

    Figure  2.  Temporal procedures and key boundary conditions of conventional extinction and retrieval-extinction (MRUP)

    图  3  药物成瘾记忆再巩固的多层级调控模型

    Figure  3.  Multilevel regulatory model of memory reconsolidation in drug addiction

    表  1  不同靶向记忆再巩固干预策略的比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of intervention strategies targeting memory reconsolidation

    干预策略 具体方法/药物 主要靶点/机制 优势与局限 证据来源与确定性
    药理学
    干预
    普萘洛尔(β-AR拮抗剂) 阻断去甲肾上腺素信号,抑制杏仁核再巩固所需的蛋白合成 优点:操作简便,起效快,多项人类研究阳性结果
    局限性:存在禁忌症(哮喘、低血压等);个体差异大;可能影响其他情绪记忆
    低:人体小样本RCT结果不一致,长期复吸结局不足
    NMDAR拮抗剂(MK-801、氯胺酮)

    阻断谷氨酸能信号,破坏记忆不稳定化 优点:动物模型效果明确
    局限性:精神副作用(解离、幻觉)显著,临床转化困难
    低:成瘾记忆证据以动物为主;氯胺酮有人体转化研究但外推受限
    mTOR抑制剂(雷帕霉素) 抑制再巩固所需的新蛋白合成 优点:选择性高,动物模型效果好
    局限性:免疫抑制作用;人类研究极少
    极低:主要为动物研究,缺乏成瘾患者RCT
    行为学
    干预
    提取-消退联合训练(MRUP) 先利用提取使记忆进入易损窗,再行消退,实现记忆更新 优点:非侵入性,无药物
    副作用;已在小规模临床研究中验证
    局限性:操作时机(窗口期)要求严格;提取范式需精确设计;效果可能受个体差异影响
    低-中:有人体对照研究和较长随访,但样本量及范式异质性较大
    厌恶对抗条件(如LiCl配对) 在再巩固窗口内将线索与厌恶结果重新配对,替换奖赏值 优点:动物模型中效果持久(14d以上)
    局限性:厌恶刺激(如LiCl)人体不可接受;仅限动物实验
    极低:动物实验为主,人体可接受性差
    物理干预 TMS
    (经颅磁刺激)
    调节前额叶等脑区兴奋性,可能干扰再巩固过程 优点:无创,靶点精确,可与提取-消退联用
    局限性:设备昂贵;参数未标准化;独立干预效果证据不足
    极低-低:TMS有成瘾临床研究,但再巩固特异性设计不足
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  靶向药物相关记忆再巩固的代表性人体对照研究及证据特征

    Table  2.   Representative controlled human studies targeting drug-related memory reconsolidation and their evidence characteristics

    研究研究对象/设计样本量干预方案主要结果/效应量随访证据评价
    Xue等[47]戒断海洛因使用者;三组对照n=66(各组22)线索提取后10 min消退 vs 6 h消退 vs 无提取消退10 min组线索诱导渴求和血压反应降低;6 h组未显示同等效应1、30、180 d低-中:时间窗对照明确且随访较长;主要结局为渴求,非真实复吸
    Saladin等[38]可卡因依赖;双盲随机安慰剂对照n=50线索提取后普萘洛尔40 mg vs 安慰剂24 h时渴求及心血管线索反应下降更明显;1周组间差异消失,未证实可卡因使用减少24 h、1周低:小样本、实验室线索结局,疗效未持续
    Pachas等[39]吸烟者;随机双盲安慰剂对照n=54记忆再激活前单次普萘洛尔 vs 安慰剂1周后生理反应、负性情绪及渴求均未见普萘洛尔优势1周低:阴性RCT;提示单次给药/提取范式可能不足
    Jobes等[40]美沙酮维持的阿片依赖合并可卡因使用者;随机双盲n=33个体化可卡因脚本再激活前普萘洛尔40 mg vs 安慰剂未观察到稳定的线索渴求或可卡因使用获益1周、5周低:小样本、复杂共病/多药使用,但为重要阴性证据
    Lonergan等[41]治疗寻求型物质依赖;先导随机双盲安慰剂对照n=17(9/8)6次个体化成瘾记忆再激活前普萘洛尔 vs 安慰剂组×时间交互F(1,14)=5.68,P=0.03;普萘洛尔组渴求d=1.40无长期随访极低:效应量大,但样本极小且缺乏随访
    Germeroth等[48]尼古丁依赖吸烟者;随机临床试验n=88随机;72完成1个月随访吸烟记忆提取-消退 vs 中性提取-消退1个月线索渴求d=0.44;每日吸烟量d=0.50;复吸/戒断天数及尿可替宁无显著差异1个月低-中:RCT、行为结局较直接;复吸指标阴性且随访仍较短
    Xue等[42]男性吸烟者;动物-人体转化随机对照n=96入组;69纳入分析普萘洛尔40 mg + 尼古丁UCS记忆提取,并设置时序对照既有线索诱导渴求d=0.64;尼古丁启动诱导渴求d=1.15;多项线索偏好d≈0.57-0.92短期实验随访低:存在效应量支持,但仅男性、脱落较多、缺乏戒烟/复吸终点
    Das等[45]有害饮酒者;随机单盲安慰剂对照n=90(3组各30)酒精奖赏记忆提取后静脉氯胺酮 vs 提取+安慰剂/无提取+氯胺酮提取+氯胺酮组短期酒精强化价值及饮酒量下降;部分改善延续数月最长9个月低-中:RCT且随访较长;对象为有害饮酒者而非典型治疗寻求型AUD
    Lin等[37]男性吸烟者;随机、盲法、安慰剂对照n=52(27/25)尼古丁相关记忆提取前单次普萘洛尔组×时间交互F(1,50)=9.55,P=0.003,η2=0.162;渴求下降并伴随脑功能连接改变约3 d低:有人体随机与影像学证据,但单中心、随访短且仅男性
    Yu等[43]酒精依赖患者;随机安慰剂对照n=40(20/20)CS记忆提取后普萘洛尔20 mg vs 安慰剂普萘洛尔组VAS渴求下降F=56.017,P<0.001;安慰剂组F=0.183,P>0.05短期测试低:直接临床证据,但样本量小、缺乏长期饮酒/复吸结局
    Yue等[49]甲基苯丙胺使用障碍;单中心三组随机对照n=98分析提取+10 min+消退 vs 提取+6 h+消退 vs 中性提取+10 min+消退10 min组在随访中持续降低线索渴求(组×时间×线索F(2,94)=14.32,P<0.001)及皮质醇反应34 d、184 d中等偏低:直接检验时间窗、6个月随访;单中心且主要为替代结局
      注:GRADE严格用于针对特定结局的“证据体”,而非对单篇研究机械分级[8]。本表的“证据评价”仅作叙述性判断,综合考虑随机化/盲法、样本量与不精确性、结局直接性、随访长度以及研究间一致性,用于显示证据强弱及主要降级原因,不替代正式系统评价中的GRADE证据概况。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Huang S, Liu X, Li Z, et al. Memory reconsolidation updating in substance addiction: Applications, mechanisms, and future prospects for clinical therapeutics[J]. Neurosci Bull, 2025, 41(2): 289-304. doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01294-z
    [2] de Almeida-Antunes N A, Sampaio A C S, Crego M A B, et al. Tackling addictive behaviors through memory suppression: A scoping review and perspective[J]. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2024, 48(8): 1421-1442. doi: 10.1111/acer.15381
    [3] Walsh K H, Das R K, Saladin M E, et al. Modulation of naturalistic maladaptive memories using behavioural and pharmacological reconsolidation-interfering strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and ‘sub-clinical’ studies[J]. Psychopharmacology, 2018, 235(9): 2507-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4983-8
    [4] Das R K, Freeman T P, Kamboj S K. The effects of N-methyl d-aspartate and B-adrenergic receptor antagonists on the reconsolidation of reward memory: A meta-analysis[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013, 37(3): 240-255. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.018
    [5] Milton A L. Drug memory reconsolidation: From molecular mechanisms to the clinical context[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2023, 13: 370. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02666-1
    [6] Xu R, Shi D, Wang K, et al. Progress in spatiotemporal regulation of fear memory: Neural circuit mechanisms and implications for PTSD[J]. Gen Psychiatry, 2025, 38(4): e102224. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2025-102224
    [7] Conde-Dusman, María J et al. Control of protein synthesis and memory by GluN3A-NMDA receptors through inhibition of GIT1/mTORC1 assembly[J]. eLife vol. 10 e71575.
    [8] Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 401-406.
    [9] Li J, Dong Y, Chen W, et al. Exploring post-retrieval strategies to reduce drug craving in methamphetamine use disorders[J]. Addict Biol, 2025, 30(6): e70049. doi: 10.1111/adb.70049
    [10] Tronson N C, Taylor J R. Addiction: A drug-induced disorder of memory reconsolidation[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2013, 23(4): 573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.022
    [11] Sorg B A. Reconsolidation of drug memories[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2012, 36(5): 1400-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.004
    [12] Nader K, Schafe G E, Le Doux J E. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6797): 722-726. doi: 10.1038/35021052
    [13] Nader K, Schafe G E, LeDoux J E. The labile nature of consolidation theory[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2000, 1(3): 216-219. doi: 10.1038/35044580
    [14] Misanin J R, Miller R R, Lewis D J. Retrograde Amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace[J]. Science, 1968, 160(3827): 554-555. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3827.554
    [15] Barak S, Liu F, Ben Hamida S, et al. Disruption of alcohol-related memories by mTORC1 inhibition prevents relapse[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2013, 16(8): 1111-1117. doi: 10.1038/nn.3439
    [16] Tang Q, Li Z, Zhang F, et al. Disruption of relapse to cocaine and morphine seeking by LiCl-induced aversive counterconditioning following memory retrieval[J]. Prog Neuro Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2024, 135: 111094. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111094
    [17] Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M. Prediction error demarcates the transition from retrieval, to reconsolidation, to new learning[J]. Learn Mem, 2014, 21(11): 580-584. doi: 10.1101/lm.035493.114
    [18] Kindt M, Soeter M, Vervliet B. Beyond extinction: Erasing human fear responses and preventing the return of fear[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2009, 12(3): 256-258. doi: 10.1038/nn.2271
    [19] Lee J L C, Nader K, Schiller D. An update on memory reconsolidation updating[J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2017, 21(7): 531-545. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.006
    [20] Monfils M H, Holmes E A. Memory boundaries: Opening a window inspired by reconsolidation to treat anxiety, trauma-related, and addiction disorders[J]. Lancet Psychiatry, 2018, 5(12): 1032-1042. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30270-0
    [21] Merlo E, Milton A L, Goozée Z Y, et al. Reconsolidation and extinction are dissociable and mutually exclusive processes: Behavioral and molecular evidence[J]. J Neurosci, 2014, 34(7): 2422-2431. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4001-13.2014
    [22] Lee J L C, Milton A L, Everitt B J. Cue-induced cocaine seeking and relapse are reduced by disruption of drug memory reconsolidation[J]. J Neurosci, 2006, 26(22): 5881-5887. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0323-06.2006
    [23] Milton A L, Everitt B J. The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: Implications for the treatment of addiction[J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2010, 31(12): 2308-2319. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07249.x
    [24] Lintas A, Chi N, Lauzon N M, et al. Identification of a dopamine receptor-mediated opiate reward memory switch in the basolateral amygdala-nucleus accumbens circuit[J]. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(31): 11172-11183. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-11.2011
    [25] Lee S H, Choi J H, Lee N, et al. Synaptic protein degradation underlies destabilization of retrieved fear memory[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5867): 1253-1256. doi: 10.1126/science.1150541
    [26] Sun Y, Giocomo L M. Neural circuit dynamics of drug-context associative learning in the mouse hippocampus[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 6721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34114-x
    [27] Otis J M, Dashew K B, Mueller D. Neurobiological dissociation of retrieval and reconsolidation of cocaine-associated memory[J]. J Neurosci, 2013, 33(3): 1271-181a. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3463-12.2013
    [28] Hu Y B, Deng X, Liu L, et al. Distinct roles of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex in the expression and reconsolidation of methamphetamine-associated memory in male mice[J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024, 49(12): 1827-1838. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01879-2
    [29] Zhao H, Li H, Meng L, et al. Disrupting heroin-associated memory reconsolidation through actin polymerization inhibition in the nucleus accumbens core[J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 2024, 28(1): pyae065. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae065
    [30] Hoeffer C A, Klann E. mTOR signaling: At the crossroads of plasticity, memory and disease[J]. Trends Neurosci, 2010, 33(2): 67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.003
    [31] Khamsing D, Lebrun S, Fanget I, et al. A role for BDNF- and NMDAR-induced lysosomal recruitment of mTORC1 in the regulation of neuronal mTORC1 activity[J]. Mol Brain, 2021, 14(1): 112. doi: 10.1186/s13041-021-00820-8
    [32] Chang R, Zhu S, Peng J, et al. The hippocampal FTO-BDNF-TrkB pathway is required for novel object recognition memory reconsolidation in mice[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2023, 13(1): 349. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02647-4
    [33] Estrada-Medina R, Briones-Llamoctanta B E, Turpo-Chaparro J E. Neuroplasticity and recovery of the brain affected by substance use disorder: Multilevel mechanisms and new therapeutic strategies (2020-2025)[J]. Front Mol Neurosci, 2026, 19: 1760387. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2026.1760387
    [34] Alaghband Y, Marshall J F. Common influences of non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists on the consolidation and reconsolidation of cocaine-cue memory[J]. Psychopharmacology, 2013, 226(4): 707-719. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2793-y
    [35] Yan Y, Newman A H, Xu M. Dopamine D1 and D3 receptors mediate reconsolidation of cocaine memories in mouse models of drug self-administration[J]. Neuroscience, 2014, 278: 154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.008
    [36] Guo X, Yuan Y, Su X, et al. Different projection neurons of basolateral amygdala participate in the retrieval of morphine withdrawal memory with diverse molecular pathways[J]. Mol Psychiatry, 2024, 29(3): 793-808. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02371-x
    [37] Lin X, Deng J, Yuan K, et al. Neural substrates of propranolol-induced impairments in the reconsolidation of nicotine-associated memories in smokers[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2021, 11: 441. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01566-6
    [38] Saladin M E, Gray K M, McRae-Clark A L, et al. A double blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of post-retrieval propranolol on reconsolidation of memory for craving and cue reactivity in cocaine dependent humans[J]. Psychopharmacology, 2013, 226(4): 721-737. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3039-3
    [39] Pachas G N, Gilman J, Orr S P, et al. Single dose propranolol does not affect physiologic or emotional reactivity to smoking cues[J]. Psychopharmacology, 2015, 232(9): 1619-1628. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3797-6
    [40] Jobes M L, Aharonovich E, Epstein D H, et al. Effects of prereactivation propranolol on cocaine craving elicited by imagery script/cue sets in opioid-dependent polydrug users: A randomized study[J]. J Addict Med, 2015, 9(6): 491-498. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000169
    [41] Lonergan M, Saumier D, Tremblay J, et al. Reactivating addiction-related memories under propranolol to reduce craving: A pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2016, 50: 245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.09.012
    [42] Xue Y X, Deng J H, Chen Y Y, et al. Effect of selective inhibition of reactivated nicotine-associated memories with propranolol on nicotine craving[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2017, 74(3): 224-232.
    [43] Yu S, Xu P J, Shi L, et al. Effect of inhibition of reactivated alcohol-associated memories with propranolol on alcohol craving[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2025, 25(1): 453. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06904-2
    [44] Brown T E, Lee B R, Sorg B A. The NMDA antagonist MK-801 disrupts reconsolidation of a cocaine-associated memory for conditioned place preference but not for self-administration in rats[J]. Learn Mem, 2008, 15(12): 857-865. doi: 10.1101/lm.1152808
    [45] Das R K, Gale G, Walsh K, et al. Ketamine can reduce harmful drinking by pharmacologically rewriting drinking memories[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 5187. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13162-w
    [46] Lin J, Liu L, Wen Q, et al. Rapamycin prevents drug seeking via disrupting reconsolidation of reward memory in rats[J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 2014, 17(1): 127-136. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001156
    [47] Xue Y X, Luo Y X, Wu P, et al. A memory retrieval-extinction procedure to prevent drug craving and relapse[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6078): 241-245. doi: 10.1126/science.1215070
    [48] Germeroth L J, Carpenter M J, Baker N L, et al. Effect of a brief memory updating intervention on smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2017, 74(3): 214-223. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3148
    [49] Yue J L, Wang R J, Chen S J, et al. Effect of conditioned stimuli-triggered memory retrieval-extinction in patients with methamphetamine use disorder[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2025, 15: 249. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03474-5
    [50] Camprodon J A, Martínez-Raga J, Alonso-Alonso M, et al. One session of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right prefrontal cortex transiently reduces cocaine craving[J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2007, 86(1): 91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.002
    [51] Hanlon C A, Dowdle L T, Correia B, et al. Left frontal pole Theta burst stimulation decreases orbitofrontal and Insula activity in cocaine users and alcohol users[J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2017, 178: 310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.039
    [52] Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M. Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced Amnesia for learned fear[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 830-833. doi: 10.1126/science.1231357
    [53] Suzuki A, Josselyn S A, Frankland P W, et al. Memory reconsolidation and extinction have distinct temporal and biochemical signatures[J]. J Neurosci, 2004, 24(20): 4787-4795. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5491-03.2004
    [54] Haubrich J, Bernabo M, Nader K. Noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus to the amygdala constrain fear memory reconsolidation[J]. eLife, 2020, 9: e57010. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57010
  • [1] 马自蓉, 张少川, 曹雪, 王宇涛, 李庆蓉.  阿尔茨海默病中神经炎症生物标志物及相关药物治疗研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(2): 1-13. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260201
    [2] 秦瑞峰, 薛佳栋, 张佳, 刘帆, 张绍辉, 尹立阳, 袁增江.  SKI通过ROS/JNK通路诱导铁死亡干预胰腺癌恶性行为, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(10): 44-52. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20251005
    [3] 贺红侠, 陈婷婷, 黄菲, 刘军武, 周鸿丽, 胥磊.  γ-氨基丁酸A型受体的激活减轻氧糖剥夺/复氧诱导的星形胶质细胞损伤, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(12): 49-57. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20251206
    [4] 杨轶涵, 陈华梅, 方育, 王玉鑫, 展希.  罗格列酮通过诱导HO-1减轻大鼠肝缺血再灌注损伤的作用机制, 昆明医科大学学报. 2024, 45(7): 14-22. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240703
    [5] 王海军, 邱良武, 习杨彦彬, 庞俊娣.  有氧运动干预慢性脑缺血学习记忆能力研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2024, 45(3): 186-191. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240328
    [6] 李茹芳, 李秋艳, 崔霞, 赵霞, 王丽梅, 蓝海.  天然药物苏木对人工脱矿釉质龋的再矿化作用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2023, 44(2): 23-26. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230208
    [7] 张成才, 宁蓉, 陈娜, 彭艺晨, 周丽, 杨晰宸, 卢静怡, 张彭跃, 李蕊.  正中神经电刺激对缺血性脑卒中大鼠突触可塑性的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2023, 44(12): 6-12. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231201
    [8] 邹超杰, 唐义凯, 杜书文, 程宇琪.  调控海马神经元中CDC42蛋白活性对小鼠记忆和焦虑行为影响的研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(11): 1-8. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221105
    [9] 毛俊鸿, 鲁丹枫, 徐玉, 代毅聪, 张哲瑞, 李悦, 王昆华.  甲基苯丙胺改变成瘾小鼠突触可塑性基因的甲基化修饰, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(1): 1-7. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220121
    [10] 李俊杰, 蒋海燕, 白文娅, 霍思颖, 孙志生, 邵建林.  沉默RND3表达对氧糖缺失/复氧复糖损伤海马神经细胞炎症反应和细胞凋亡的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(10): 14-21. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211012
    [11] 杨振东, 兰云艳, 郑宇, 冯煜然, 朱梅.  超声刺激小鼠伏隔核后c-Fos蛋白及结构可塑性改变的实验, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(6): 45-49. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210645
    [12] 房树华, 陈昕晟, 曹莉, 王娜.  内源性NO介导的Stargazin亚硝基化修饰在脑缺血再灌注后突触可塑性中的作用及机制, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(8): 47-53. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210809
    [13] 刘娟, 张小梅, 张帆, 杨春燕, 李娜, 田莹.  药物联合音乐疗法对缓解慢性神经病理性疼痛的有效性, 昆明医科大学学报. 2020, 41(04): 64-68.
    [14] 刘静.  高危早产儿早期行神经发育干预改善运动和认知发育的作用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2016, 37(03): -.
    [15] 周艺蕉, 胡平, 角述兰, 赵宁辉, 杨露艳, 陈甜子.  全凭静脉麻醉和静吸复合麻醉对神经外科术中脑代谢影响的比较, 昆明医科大学学报. 2016, 37(12): 103-106.
    [16] 邢文忠.  昆钢医院2011年至2013年实施抗菌药物专项整治和药学干预的效果分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(06): -.
    [17] 张红红.  家长伦理道德缺失对儿童“性病”诊疗影响分析与干预, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(03): -.
    [18] 马珊.  凉血活血药物对氧诱导小鼠视网膜新生血管实验中HIF-1和NF-κB的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2012, 33(10): 1-1.
    [19] 陈晋.  玉溪市人民医院抗菌药物使用强度分析及干预管理, 昆明医科大学学报. 2012, 33(11): -.
    [20] .  胆石病的诊治策略, 昆明医科大学学报. 2011, 32(11): -.
  • 加载中
图(3) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-05-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-10-02

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回