Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Kangfuxin Combined with Adenosine Monophosphate in the Treatment of Paediatric Herpetic Stomatitis
-
摘要:
目的 系统评价康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的安全性和有效性。 方法 检索各数据库中康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的随机对照试验(RCTs),使用RevMan 5.4 软件进行Meta分析。 结果 共纳入12篇RCTs,样本量1 094例。Meta分析显示,康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷可显著提高小儿疱疹性口腔炎临床总有效率[RR = 1.21,95%CI(1.16,1.28),P < 0.00001 ]。与单磷酸阿糖腺苷常规抗病毒治疗组相比,康复新液组不良事件发生率更低[RR = 0.26,95%CI(0.14,0.51),P <0.00001 ]。此外,康复新液组还能有效缩短疱疹消失(皮损愈合)时间、疼痛消失时间、退热时间、流涎消失时间、恢复饮食时间(P < 0.05),在促进淋巴细胞(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+和CD4+/CD8+)、血清学水平(CRP、TNF-α、WBC、IL-10、VEGF、EGF及IL-6)恢复上有优势(P < 0.05)。结论 康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎有较好的疗效和安全性,对于缩短小儿疱疹性口腔炎的症状恢复时间、改善淋巴细胞和血清学水平指标上有优势。 Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of Kangfuxin liquid combined with adenosine monophosphate in the treatment of paediatric herpetic stomatitis. Methods Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of Kangfuxin liquid combined with adenosine monophosphate for the treatment of paediatric herpetic stomatitis were searched in various databases, and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs with a sample size of 1,094 cases were included. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of Kangfuxin liquid with adenosine monophosphate significantly increased [RR = 1.21, 95%CI (1.16, 1.28), P < 0.00001 ] the overall clinical efficacy rate of paediatric herpetic stomatitis. Compared with the conventional antiviral treatment group with adenosine monophosphate, the incidence of adverse events was lower in the Kangfuxin liquid group [RR = 0.26, 95%CI (0.14, 0.51), P <0.00001 ]. In addition, the Kangfuxin liquid group could effectively shorten the time for herpes disappearance (skin lesion healing), pain disappearance, fever reduction, salivation disappearance and recovery of diet (P < 0.05), and had advantages in promoting the recovery of lymphocytes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+), serological levels (CRP, TNF-α, WBC, IL-10, VEGF, EGF, and IL-6) (P < 0.05).Conclusion Kangfuxin liquid combined with adenosine monophosphate has the better efficacy and safety in the treatment of paediatric herpetic stomatitis, and has advantages in shortening the symptomatic recovery time and improving the indicators of lymphocyte and serological levels in paediatric herpetic stomatitis. -
Key words:
- Kangfuxin /
- Adenosine monophosphate /
- Herpes stomatitis /
- Meta-analysis
-
表 1 纳入文献的基本特征($\bar x \pm s $)
Table 1. Basic characteristics of included studies ($\bar x \pm s $)
纳入文献 样本(n) 年龄(岁) 体质量(kg) 病程(h) 干预措施 疗程(d) 结局指标 试验组 对照组 试验组 对照组 试验组 对照组 试验组 对照组 试验组 对照组 谢丹丹[5]2024 50 50 2.83 ± 0.58 2.85 ± 0.57 13.60 ± 2.20 13.50 ± 2.10 —— —— KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg/d,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) 7 (1)(2)(3)
(4)(5)王虹[6]2023 46 46 3.39 ± 0.12 3.54 ± 0.14 —— —— 106.56 ± 5.28 108.72 ± 5.04 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) 6 (1)(2)
(3)(4)宋娜[7]2022 40 40 4.14 ± 1.41 3.65 ± 1.37 12.08 ± 2.69 11.77 ± 2.51 —— —— KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd) 7 (1)(2)
(4)(5)潘俊文[8]2021 25 25 4.52 ± 1.23 4.53 ± 1.25 —— —— —— —— KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(0.1 g,qd) Ara-AMP(0.1 g,qd) 5 (1)(2) 赵越[9] 2021 60 60 4.43 ± 1.07 4.21 ± 1.03 —— —— 24.48 ± 3.36 24.73 ± 3.51 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,qd) 5 (1)(2)
(3)(4)丁丽萍[10] 2021 30 30 4.10 ± 0.45 3.76 ± 0.41 —— —— 95.76 ± 9.84 88.8 ± 9.84 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) 5 (1)(2)(4) 崔小会[11] 2020 37 37 3.11 ± 0.96 2.96 ± 0.84 —— —— 52.8 ± 12.24 57.84 ± 10.56 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(0.1 g,qd) Ara-AMP(0.1 g,qd) 3~5 (1)(4) 李香君[12] 2019 46 46 3.28 ± 1.44 3.31 ± 1.48 —— —— 23.13 ± 4.32 23.11 ± 4.29 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) 5 (1)(2)
(4)(5)全翠芬[13] 2018 43 43 3.37 ± 1.25 2.16 ± 1.66 12.68 ± 2.09 11.82 ± 2.46 —— —— KFX(5-10 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5-10 mg/kg,qd) Ara-AMP(5-10 mg/kg,qd) — (1)(2)(5) 周波[14] 2018 50 50 3.32 ± 0.53 3.42 ± 0.61 —— —— —— —— KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) — (1)(4) 肖雷[15] 2017 70 70 3.32 ± 0.53 3.42 ± 0.61 —— —— 21.32 ± 10.21 22.64 ± 9.82 KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AM(5 mg/kg,qd)P+RJM(20 mg,tid) Ara-AMP(5 mg/kg,qd)+RJM(20 mg,tid) 5 (1)(2)(4) 陈学锋[16] 2015 50 50 —— —— —— —— —— —— KFX(5 mL,tid)+Ara-AMP(5-10 mg/kg,qd) Ara-AMP(5-10 mg/kg,qd) 3~5 (1)(2) 注:T:实验组;C:对照组;——:未提及;KFX:康复新液;Ara-AMP:单磷酸阿糖腺苷;RJM:溶菌酶肠溶片;结局指标:(1)症状改善时间(退热时间、口腔疼痛和口腔疱疹消退时间、流涎消退时间、恢复饮食时间);(2)临床疗效比较(总有效率);(3)两组T淋巴细胞亚群水平(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+);(4)两组血清学水平(WBC、VEGF、EGF、IL-10、IL-6、CRP、TNF-α);(5)不良反应事件。 表 2 淋巴细胞的Meta分析
Table 2. Meta-analysis of lymphocytes
表 3 血清学指标的Meta分析
Table 3. Tab.3Meta-analysis of serologic indicators
结局指标 纳入文献(篇) 样本量(n) 异质性检验 Meta分析 P I 2 MD 95%CI P WBC 7篇[5-6,9-10,12,14-15] 704 < 0.00001 **85% 2.26 1.54~2.98 < 0.00001 **IL-10 8篇[5−7,9−12,15] 758 < 0.00001 **93% 16.10 8.07~24.12 < 0.00001 **VEGF 2篇[5-6] 192 0.00008 **91% 41.83 13.31~70.36 0.004** EGF 2篇[5-6] 192 < 0.00001 **98% 7.89 −5.32~21.11 0.24 IL-6 2篇[5-6] 192 < 0.00001 **96% 11.98 5.11~18.85 0.0006 ****P < 0.01 -
[1] 蔡秋晗,李新民,蔡越冬,等. 口炎清颗粒治疗小儿疱疹性口炎(阴虚风热证)的随机对照、多中心临床研究[J]. 药物评价研究,2020,43(9):1792-1796. [2] 江载芳,申昆玲,沈颖. 诸福棠实用儿科学[M]. 第8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2015:831-832 [3] 王辉,陆瑶伽. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷注射剂联合溶菌酶肠溶片治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志,2017,33(14):1311-1313. [4] 邓华夏,朱月圆,邓传玺. 康复新液防治口腔疾病的最新研究进展[J]. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2021,5(14):136-139. [5] 谢丹丹,卢燕香,喻春梅. 甘草泻心汤联合康复新液与Ara-AMP对疱疹性口腔炎的疗效及影响[J]. 实用中西医结合临床,2024,24(9):34-37. [6] 王虹,张昕,胡爱萍,等. 康复新液对疱疹性口腔炎患儿的疗效观察[J]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2023,7(6):95-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3718.2023.06.031 [7] 宋娜,宋均琴. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷与康复新液治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的效果[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2022,13(16):129-133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022.16.028 [8] 潘俊文. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合康复新液对小儿疱疹性口腔炎的治疗价值研究[J]. 母婴世界,2021,1(17):99. [9] 赵越,高杰. 康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的疗效和对T淋巴细胞百分比的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2021,36(16):3755-3758. [10] 丁丽萍. 康复新液联合溶菌酶、单磷酸阿糖腺苷对小儿疱疹性口腔炎的疗效及炎症因子影响[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2021,19(25):210-211. [11] 崔小会. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合康复新液治疗疱疹性口腔炎临床疗效分析[J]. 黑龙江中医药,2020,49(2):32-33. [12] 李香君,沈丹,李艳敏,等. 康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷、溶菌酶治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2019,37(5):1222-1224. [13] 全翠芬. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合康复新液治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志,2018,28(17):139-140. [14] 周波. 康复新液与单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合溶菌酶治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响评价[J]. 养生保健指南,2018,1(3):302-302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6845.2018.03.289 [15] 肖雷,邹学红. 康复新液联合单磷酸阿糖腺苷、溶菌酶治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志,2017,26(35):3951-3953. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2017.35.013 [16] 陈学锋,伍雄英. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合康复新液治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎临床体会[J]. 今日健康,2015,14(10):143-144. [17] Boitsaniuk S,Levkiv M,Fedoniuk L,et al. Acute herpetic stomatitis: Clinical manifestations,diagnostics and treatment strategies[J]. Wiad Lek,2022,75(1):318-323. [18] Marzuqi N,Taqwim A,Vitasari N,et al. Management of acute primary herpetic gingivo-stomatitis in children[J]. IJDM,2019,2(2):29-31. [19] 王钦,刘克娜,孔彩华,等. 美洲大蠊提取物的活性成分及其抗氧化应激的研究现状[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2021,39(7):124-127. [20] 白春昕. 单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合康复新液治疗小儿疱疹性口腔炎的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2020,14(2):182-184. -