Predictive Value of Tissue AMPK α and HNF4 Expression for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastasis after Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
-
摘要:
目的 研究单磷酸腺苷激活蛋白激酶(adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase,AMPKα)、肝细胞核因子4(hepatocyte nuclear factor 4,HNF4)表达对腹腔镜胃癌根治术后局部复发和远处转移的预测价值。 方法 选取2020年1月—2022年8月遂宁市中心医院收治的行腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者294例,根据术后局部复发和远处转移情况分为复发转移组(n = 59)、无复发转移组(n = 235)。取手术切除的胃癌组织标本,检测比较两组癌组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA,并统计分析数据。 结果 复发转移组AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA低于无复发转移组(P < 0.05);点二列相关性显示,AMPKα mRNA(r = -0.816)、HNF4 mRNA(r = -0.803)与术后局部复发和远处转移呈负相关(P < 0.001),净相关性分析显示排除混杂因素后这种关系仍存在(P < 0.001);Logistic回归分析,AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA是术后局部复发和远处转移相关影响因素(P < 0.001);交互作用分析,AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA为超相乘模型,HNF4 mRNA降低对AMPKα mRNA降低的效应具有正向交互作用(P < 0.05);AMPKα mRNA+HNF4 mRNA的AUC大于AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA(Z = 4.261、4.275,P < 0.05)。 结论 联合检测AMPKα、HNF4表达可预测腹腔镜胃癌根治术后局部复发和远处转移风险。 Abstract:Objective To study the predictive value of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPKα) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4) expression for local recurrence and distant metastasis after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods Two hundred and ninety-four patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery admitted to Suining Central Hospital from January 2020 to August 2022 were selected. These patients were categorized into a recurrence and metastasis group (n = 59) and a non-recurrence and non-metastasis group (n = 235) based on postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis. Gastric cancer tissue specimens obtained from surgical resection were used to detect and compare the cancer tissues of AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA between the two groups, and the data were statistically analyzed. Results The AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA in the recurrence and metastasis group were lower than those in the non recurrence and metastasis group (P < 0.05); the point-biserial correlation showed that AMPKα mRNA (r = -0.816) and HNF4 mRNA (r = -0.803) were negatively correlated with postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis (P < 0.001), and the net correlation analysis showed that this relationship still existed after excluding confounding factors (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA were postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis related influencing factors (P < 0.001); the interaction analysis showed that AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA were in a super multiplication model, and the decrease of HNF4 mRNA had a positive interaction effect on the decrease of AMPKα mRNA (P < 0.05); the AUC of AMPKα mRNA+HNF4 mRNA was higher than that of AMPKα mRNA or HNF4 mRNA (Z = 4.261, 4.275, P < 0.05). Conclusion Combined detection of AMPKα and HNF4 expression can predict the risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. -
表 1 引物序列
Table 1. Primer sequences
基因名称 上游引物 下游引物 长度(bp) AMPKα 5'-CCTGCTTGATGCACATGA-3' 5'-TCTGGGCCTGCATACAATCT-3' 20 HNF4 5'-GCACCAACCTCAACGC-3' 5'-AGGCTGCTGTCCTCATAG-3' 22 GAPDH 5'AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG-3' 5'-AGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3' 23 表 2 两组基线资料比较[($\bar x \pm s $)/n(%)]
Table 2. Comparison of baseline information between the two groups [($\bar x \pm s $)/n(%)]
资料 复发转移组(n=59) 无复发转移组(n=235) t/χ2/z P 年龄(岁) 63.19 ± 7.03 61.99 ± 8.25 1.027 0.305 性别 0.024 0.877 男 35(59.32) 142(60.43) 女 24(40.68) 93(39.57) 体质量指数(kg/m2) 22.78 ± 1.35 22.85 ± 1.44 0.338 0.736 ECOG评分(分) 0.050 0.823 0 38(64.41) 155(65.96) 1 21(35.59) 80(34.04) ASA分级 0.184 0.854 Ⅰ 41(69.49) 167(71.06) Ⅱ 17(28.81) 64(27.23) Ⅲ 1(1.69) 4(1.70) 肿瘤长径(cm) 4.82 ± 1.13 4.59 ± 1.53 1.082 0.280 手术方式 0.140 0.708 全腹腔镜 11(18.64) 39(16.60) 腹腔镜辅助 48(81.36) 196(83.40) 临床分期 0.211 0.833 Ⅰ 12(20.34) 50(21.28) Ⅱ 23(38.98) 93(39.57) Ⅲ 24(40.68) 92(39.15) 组织学类型 0.044 0.834 印戒细胞癌/低分化腺癌 33(55.93) 135(57.45) 中高分化腺癌 26(44.07) 100(42.55) 血管侵犯 19(32.20) 70(29.79) 0.130 0.718 淋巴结侵犯 14(23.73) 51(21.70) 0.112 0.737 辅助化疗 45(76.27) 184(78.30) 0.112 0.737 手术至化疗时间(d) 31.02 ± 4.86 29.75 ± 5.26 1.683 0.094 化疗周期(个) 5.16 ± 1.72 4.94 ± 1.64 0.912 0.362 表 3 两组间组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA比较[($ \bar x \pm s$),n = 294]
Table 3. Comparison of tissues AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA between the two groups [($ \bar x \pm s$),n = 294]
组别 n AMPKα mRNA HNF4 mRNA 复发转移组 59 0.34 ± 0.11 0.43 ± 0.13 无复发转移组 235 0.82 ± 0.27 0.75 ± 0.24 t 13.366 9.876 P <0.001* <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 4 组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA与术后局部复发和远处转移的净相关性分析
Table 4. Net correlation analysis of tissue AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA with postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis
变量 净相关性系数 95%CI P AMPKα mRNA −0.801 0.341~0.915 <0.001* HNF4 mRNA −0.799 0.325~0.848 <0.001* 表 5 组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA对术后局部复发和远处转移的影响
Table 5. Effect of tissue AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA on local recurrence and distant metastasis after surgery
影响因素 β SE Wald χ2 OR 95%CI P 下限 上限 AMPKα mRNA −0.815 0.226 13.005 0.443 0.315 0.622 <0.001* HNF4 mRNA −0.533 0.137 15.141 0.587 0.407 0.846 <0.001* 常数项 3.672 0.082 19.773 − − − <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 6 组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA预测术后局部复发和远处转移的参数
Table 6. Parameters of tissue AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA predicting local recurrence and distant metastasis after surgery
指标 AUC 95%CI cut-off值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) P AMPKα mRNA 0.774 0.722~0.820 0.43 76.27 69.79 <0.001* HNF4 mRNA 0.761 0.708~0.809 0.56 79.66 62.55 <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 7 组织AMPKα mRNA、HNF4 mRNA交互影响术后局部复发和远处转移的作用
Table 7. Interactive effect of AMPKα mRNA and HNF4 mRNA on postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis
AMPKα
mRNA降低HNF4
mRNA降低复发转移组 无复发转移组 OR(95%CI) P β γ βe βeg 否 否 5 147 1.000 − − − − 否 是 9 30 8.820(2.761~28.180) <0.001* 2.177 − − 是 否 8 41 5.737(1.781~18.479) <0.001* 1.747 − − 是 是 37 17 63.988(22.163~184.747) <0.001* 2.177 4.159 1.910 *P < 0.05。 -
[1] Wang F H, Zhang X T, Tang L, et al. The Chinese society of clinical oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2024, 44(1): 127-172. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12516 [2] Díaz Del Arco C, Fernández Aceñero M J, Ortega Medina L. Liquid biopsy for gastric cancer: Techniques, applications, and future directions[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2024, 30(12): 1680-1705. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i12.1680 [3] Stroobant E E, Strong V E. Advances in gastric cancer surgical management[J]. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2024, 38(3): 547-557. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.01.003 [4] Wang C, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. A bibliometric analysis of gastric cancer liver metastases: Advances in mechanisms of occurrence and treatment options[J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(4): 2288-2299. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001068 [5] Mullen JT. Top Gastric cancer articles from 2022 and 2023 to inform your cancer practice[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(6): 3978-3983. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15072-8 [6] Pisani A, Libânio D, Kunovský L. Shedding a new light on gastric cancer screening[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2024, 12(6): 662-663. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12600 [7] 张洁. 番茄碱通过AMPK/COX-2通路调控食管癌细胞凋亡的机制研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(16): 2348-2352. [8] 黎兵, 何维, 向加林, 等. LASS2通过AMPKα/mTORC1信号通路诱导HepG2肝癌细胞自噬和凋亡[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2022, 19(20): 2781-2785. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2022.20.011 [9] Hatziapostolou M, Koutsioumpa M, Zaitoun AM, et al. Promoter methylation leads to hepatocyte nuclear Factor 4A Loss and pancreatic cancer aggressiveness[J]. Gastro Hep Adv, 2024, 3(5): 687-702. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.04.005 [10] 陈豪, 余佩武, 黄昌明, 等. 腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌10年预后及影响因素分析: 基于CLASS队列的全国多中心研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(3): 362-374. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220221-00100 [11] 中华医学会肿瘤学分会, 中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会胃癌临床诊疗指南(2021版)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(16): 1169-1189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220127-00197 [12] 中国医师协会腹腔镜外科医师培训学院, 中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会, 中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会, 等. 中国腹腔镜胃癌根治手术质量控制专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(5): 573-585. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220328-00170 [13] 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会腔镜与机器人外科分会, 等. 腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2023版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(4): 425-436. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230317-00113 [14] 时延龙, 周鹏, 王雪凯, 等. 栀子苷通过AMPK/SIRT1/NF-κB通路调节乳腺癌细胞增殖、焦亡和侵袭[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2022, 39(11): 1700-1705. [15] 康晓芳, 贾亚青, 张占峰. 七氟烷对甲状腺癌细胞AMPK-SIRT1-PGC-1α信号通路的调控作用研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2023, 30(3): 143-147. [16] Asanoma K, Yagi H, Onoyama I, et al. The BHLHE40‒PPM1F‒AMPK pathway regulates energy metabolism and is associated with the aggressiveness of endometrial cancer[J]. J Biol Chem, 2024, 300(3): 105695. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105695 [17] Konieczny P, Adamus T, Sułkowski M, et al. Impact of AMPK on cervical carcinoma progression and metastasis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2023, 14(1): 43. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05583-9 [18] 吴丹, 曹司, 黄坤. CDX2、HNF4α、SOX2蛋白联合检测对幽门螺杆菌感染相关高危胃癌的诊断价值[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2021, 49(6): 695-698. [19] Zeng X, Gong G, Ganesan K, et al. Spatholobus suberectus inhibits lipogenesis and tumorigenesis in triple-negative breast cancer via activation of AMPK-ACC and K-Ras-ERK signaling pathway[J]. J Tradit Complement Med, 2023, 13(6): 623-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2023.09.002 [20] Holton NW, Singhal M, Kumar A, et al. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α regulates expression of the serotonin transporter in intestinal epithelial cells[J]. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2020, 318(6): C1294-C1304. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00477.2019 [21] He XX, Luo SS, Qin HQ, et al. MicroRNA-766-3p-mediated downregulation of HNF4G inhibits proliferation in colorectal cancer cells through the PI3K/AKT pathway[J]. Cancer Gene Ther, 2022, 29(6): 803-813. doi: 10.1038/s41417-021-00362-0 [22] Zhang L, Wang N, Chen M, et al. HDAC6/FOXP3/HNF4α axis promotes bile acids induced gastric intestinal metaplasia[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2022, 12(3): 1409-1422. [23] Hu Q, Li L L, Peng Z, et al. Expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha, wingless-related integration site, and β-catenin in clinical gastric cancer[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2022, 10(21): 7242-7255. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7242 [24] Dwivedi S, Hernández-Montes G, Montaño L F, et al. Chromosomally unstable gastric cancers overexpressing claudin-6 disclose cross-Talk between HNF1A and HNF4A, and upregulated cholesterol metabolism[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(22): 13977. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213977 [25] 卢豪, 范纪昌, 周立强, 等. HNF4A在胃癌中的表达及多数据库分析和实验研究[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2023, 58(3): 434-441. -