The Application of Mini-CEX Oriented by Nurses’ Core Competencies in the Clinical Teaching of Intern Nursing Students
-
摘要:
目的 探讨以护士核心胜任力为导向的Mini-CEX在实习护生临床教学中的应用。 方法 将 2023年1 月1日至2024年4月30日在昆明医科大学第一附属医院实习的 50 名学生随机分成实验组和对照组,每组25人。对照组采取传统临床教学模式,实验组运用Mini-CEX带教模式,分析对比两组护生出入科时的各项数据指标。 结果 出科时两组护生评分均高于入科时(P < 0.05),实验组在护理问诊、护理查体、护理诊断、护理措施、人文关怀、组织效能、健康咨询、整体评价等方面的评分均为优秀,得分明显高于对照组(P < 0.05),各项分数的提高程度也优于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 以护士核心胜任力为导向的Mini-CEX可以提升实习护生的临床护理能力,增强临床实践技能培育效果。 Abstract:Objective To explore the application of Mini-CEX oriented by nurses' core competencies in the clinical teaching of intern nursing students. Methods A total of 50 students, interning in the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 1, 2023 to April 30, 2024, were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 25 students in each group. The control group was taught by traditional clinical teaching methods, and the experimental group by Mini-CEX. The data indicators of the two groups of intern nursing students were analyzed and compared at entry into and exit from the department, respectively. Results The scores of the two groups were higher than those at entry into the department (P < 0.05), and the intern nursing students in the experimental group had excellent scores in nursing consultation, nursing examination, nursing diagnosis, nursing measures, humanistic care, organizational effectiveness, health consultation, and overall evaluation, and the scores were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The improvement in all the scores was also better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Mini-CEX, which is oriented to the nurse’ core competencies of nurses, can improve the clinical nursing abilities of intern nursing students and enhance the cultivation effect of clinical practice skills. -
Key words:
- Mini - CEX /
- Nurse’ core competencies /
- Intern nursing students
-
表 1 教师评分的一致性比较 [分,($ \bar x \pm s$),n = 8]
Table 1. Comparison of teacher rating consistency[points,($ \bar x \pm s $),n = 8]
评价指标 评分分数 最小值 最大值 W P 护理问诊 7.00 ± 0.54 6 8 0.527 <0.001* 护理查体 6.25 ± 0.89 5 8 护理诊断 6.63 ± 0.52 6 7 护理措施 6.75 ± 1.17 5 8 健康咨询 6.38 ± 1.06 5 8 人文关怀 7.38 ± 0.74 7 9 组织效能 6.25 ± 0.89 5 7 整体评价 6.63 ± 0.52 6 7 总分 53.25 ± 3.66 48 58 *P < 0.05。 表 2 两组实习护生一般资料比较[n(%)/($ \bar x \pm s $),n = 25]
Table 2. Comparison of general data between two groups of intern nursing students [n(%)/($ \bar x \pm s $),n = 25]
基本信息 对照组 实验组 χ2 P 年龄(岁) 21.80 ± 0.96 21.40 ± 1.04 1.414 0.164 性别 男 2(8.00) 1(4.00) 0.000 1.000 女 23(92.00) 24(96.00) 学历 本科 25(100.00) 25(100.00) 表 3 两组实习护生入科及出科时Mini-CEX分数比较[($\bar x \pm s $),n = 25]
Table 3. Comparison of Mini-CEX scores between two groups of intern nursing students when they entered and left the department[($\bar x \pm s $),n = 25]
评价指标 时间 对照组 实验组 t P 护理问诊 入科 4.72 ± 1.37 4.96 ± 1.17 −0.666 0.509 出科 6.24 ± 1.20 7.40 ± 0.65 −4.257 <0.001* 差值 1.52 ± 1.29 5.869 <0.001* 2.44 ± 1.33 8.941 <0.001* 护理查体 入科 4.68 ± 1.60 4.92 ± 1.44 −0.557 0.580 出科 6.48 ± 1.19 7.44 ± 0.51 −3.700 0.001* 差值 1.80 ± 1.58 5.692 <0.001* 2.52 ± 1.48 9.205 <0.001* 护理诊断 入科 4.72 ± 1.43 5.08 ± 1.50 −0.869 0.389 出科 6.32 ± 1.22 7.56 ± 0.71 −4.402 <0.001* 差值 1.60 ± 1.35 5.908 <0.001* 2.48 ± 1.74 8.540 <0.001* 护理措施 入科 4.72 ± 1.51 5.00 ± 1.32 −0.696 0.490 出科 6.64 ± 1.19 7.60 ± 0.65 −3.555 0.001* 差值 1.92 ± 1.29 7.451 <0.001* 2.60 ± 1.44 7.147 <0.001* 健康咨询 入科 4.88 ± 1.36 4.96 ± 1.49 −0.198 0.844 出科 6.52 ± 1.30 7.52 ± 0.77 −3.319 0.002* 差值 1.80 ± 1.41 6.364 <0.001* 2.56 ± 1.56 9.007 <0.001* 人文关怀 入科 5.28 ± 1.79 6.24 ± 1.64 −1.976 0.054 出科 6.88 ± 1.20 8.16 ± 0.69 −4.623 <0.001* 差值 1.60 ± 1.44 5.543 <0.001* 1.92 ± 1.68 8.222 <0.001* 组织效能 入科 4.68 ± 1.41 4.88 ± 1.17 −0.547 0.587 出科 6.56 ± 1.29 7.48 ± 0.65 −3.174 0.003* 差值 1.88 ± 1.27 7.408 <0.001* 2.60 ± 1.35 5.710 <0.001* 整体评价 入科 4.84 ± 1.60 5.00 ± 1.08 −0.415 0.680 出科 6.80 ± 1.04 7.48 ± 0.59 −2.847 0.007* 差值 1.96 ± 1.62 6.051 <0.001* 2.48 ± 1.19 9.601 <0.001* 总分 入科 50.12 ± 13.99 54.36 ± 11.18 −1.184 0.242 出科 66.48 ± 9.69 76.48 ± 4.06 −4.758 <0.001* 差值 16.36 ± 11.35 7.205 <0.001* 22.12 ± 12.37 10.382 <0.001* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] 徐贵霞,李秀川,刘春芳,等. 基于客观结构化临床考试的护理专业学生临床思维能力培养研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2024,49(3):415-420. [2] 郭中献,沙丽艳,张建华,等. 基于护理迷你临床演练评估量表的临床教学模式的设计与实施[J]. 护理学杂志,2017,32(6):74-77. [3] 叶郁红,陈余朋,张文敏,等. BOPPPS教学模式在病理学微课教学中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2024,16(6):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2024.06.017 [4] 胡赛静,毛崇溶,陈彦凡,等. OSCE考核系统在临床技能学教学质量提升中的运用[J]. 安徽医专学报,2023,22(2):100-102. [5] Norcini J J,Blank L L,Arnold G K,et al. The Mini-CEX(clinical evaluation exercise),a preliminary investigation[J]. Ann Intern Med,1995,123(10):795-799. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00008 [6] Chen Y Y,Chlu Y C,Chu T S,et al. Is the rating result reliable? A new approach to respond to a medical trainee's concerns about the reliability of Mini-CEX assessment[J]. J Formos Med Assoc,2022,121(5):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.07.005 [7] Motefakker S,Shirinabadi Farahani A,Nourian M,et al. The impact of the evaluations made by Mini-CEX on the clinical competency of nursing students[J]. BMC Med Educ,2022,22(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03667-2 [8] 赵静,王凤蕊,郑婷,等. 基于Nursing-Mini-CEX的教学模式对培养护理本科实习生临床护理能力的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(11):163-165. [9] 李晓松. 卫生统计学[M]. 第八版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017. [10] 伊静. 护理迷你临床演练评估量表的编制及信效度研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学,2015. [11] 杨凤娟,丁倩,杨慧,等. 基于Mini-cex评估的模块化教学对胸外科实习护生专科实践能力的影响[J]. 全科护理,2023,21(8):1139-1142. [12] 李妍平,杨飞,欧阳骞,等. 基于OBE理念的Mini-CEX评估模式在神经内科临床实习教学中的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2024,45(3):192-197. [13] 秦小芬,李懿丽,文爱媛,等. 思维导图联合Mini-CEX在胸外科健康评估教学中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2024,39(11):81-85. [14] 赵静,王凤蕊,郑婷,等. 基于Nursing-Mini-CEX的教学模式对培养护理本科实习生临床护理能力的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(11):163-165. [15] 吕艳丽,杨士来,黄春颖,等. 泉州市某高职医学院不同年级高职护生共情能力与死亡焦虑的相关分析[J]. 职业与健康,2022,38(13):1825-1829. [16] 何玲,吕孟菊. CBL,PBL联合Nursing-Mini-CEX教学模式在肝胆外科临床教学中的应用研究[J]. 教育观察,2023,12(28):13-17. [17] 潘晓,黄惠桥,陶品月. 基于改良Mini-CEX量表的教学模式对护理实习生人文关怀品质的影响研究[J]. 临床护理杂志,2020,19(1):77-80. [18] 叶菀,艾美花,王俊蕊,等. 护理迷你临床演练评估量表在急诊科护生护理技能教学中的应用[J]. 现代临床护理,2020,19(2):50-54. [19] 吕义云,李金利,郑秋香,等. Mini-cex结合微课教学在新入职护士规范化培训中的应用[J]. 智慧健康,2023,9(8):186-189. [20] 郭中献. 护理迷你临床演练评估量表在本科护生临床实习教学中的应用研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学,2017. [21] Martinsen S S S,Espeland T,Berg E A R,et al. Examining the educational impact of the mini-CEX: A randomised controlled study[J]. BMC Med Educ,2021,21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02670-3 -